Abstract
This paper presents an experiment with three artificial agents adopting different strategies when being interrupted by human conversational partners. The agent either ignored the interruption (the most common behavior in conversational engines to date), yielded the turn to the human conversational partner right away, or acknowledged the interruption, finished its thought and then responded to the content of the interruption. Our results show that this change in the agent’s conversational behavior had a significant impact on which personality traits people assigned to the agent, as well as how much they enjoyed interacting with it. Moreover, the data also indicates that human interlocutors adapted their own conversational behavior. Our findings suggest that the interactive behavior of an artificial agent should be carefully designed to match its desired personality and the intended conversational dynamics.
Copyright Notice
The documents contained in these directories are included by the contributing authors as a means to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work on a non-commercial basis. Copyright and all rights therein are maintained by the authors or by other copyright holders, notwithstanding that they have offered their works here electronically. It is understood that all persons copying this information will adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author’s copyright. These works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.